This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dunleavy, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Globalization of Public Services Production: Can Government be 'Best in World'?

London School of Economics and Political Science

New public management strategies (NPM) constitute a powerful model of how virtually all aspects of public services production can be brought to more closely approximate those in private industry. Although the full NPM agenda is only partially implemented in some countries, it has already had enormous impacts in creating a proto-market in the public services. This 'market' may remain a domain of diversified, small-scale, mainly single-country provider organizations. Or it may develop on more oligopolistic and trans-national lines as a new field of big corporate dominance. Private sector trends in the evolution of service industries, changing information technology, organizational patterns and commodification processes make the corporate option more likely.

Inside government agencies bureau-shaping motivations sustain the NPM approach and create a strong disposition towards embracing radical outsourcing, and residualizing government's implementation roles, a direction reinforced by the marketization of public services. Transnational pressures on nation states to standardize policies will powerfully erode the existing single- country distinctiveness of public service markets, increasing the potential for dominance by large corporations. These developments are likely to erode the 'core competencies' of government, undermining the state's ability to act even as an 'intelligent consumer' in the face of increasing concentrations of expertise, investment and implementation with corporate actors.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 9, No. 2, 36-64 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/095207679400900204


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Harris Digital technology and governance in transition: The case of the British Library Human Relations, May 1, 2008; 61(5): 741 - 758. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Boin, O. James, and M. Lodge The New Public Management 'Revolution' in Political Control of the Public Sector: Promises and Outcomes in Three European Prison Systems Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2006; 21(2): 81 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. van Thiel Trends in the Public Sector: Why Politicians Prefer Quasi-Autonomous Organizations Journal of Theoretical Politics, April 1, 2004; 16(2): 175 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Levy Critical Success Factors in Public Management Reform: The Case of the European Commission International Review of Administrative Sciences, December 1, 2003; 69(4): 553 - 566. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Levy Modernising EU Programme Management Public Policy and Administration, January 1, 2002; 17(1): 72 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Evans and P. McComb Policy Transfer Networks and Collaborative Government: The Case of Social Security Fraud Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 1999; 14(2): 30 - 48. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Book Reviews : ABRAM DE SWAAN (ED.) Social policy beyond borders: the social question in transnational perspective: Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 1994, pp. 115, ISBN 90 5356 069 6 Journal of European Social Policy, January 1, 1996; 6(1): 74 - 77. [PDF]