Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Constructing Accountability: Network Governance and Managerial Agency

Janet Newman

Open University

This article explores accountability as a socially constructed and contested concept. The increasing significance of network governance, in which responsibility for policy making and delivery is shared across organisational boundaries, renders traditional concepts of accountability problematic. New regulatory mechanisms are being introduced in an attempt to hold actors to account; but at the same time, the article argues, it is important to trace how actors themselves are constructing and reworking practical concepts of accountability to guide their everyday decision-making. The article draws on data from group discussions and interviews with public service managers in the UK to explore constructions of accountability in the ambiguous terrain of network governance, and highlights some of the fault lines emerging across this complex field of power.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 19, No. 4, 17-33 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/095207670401900402


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
A. Dudau
Leadership in Public Sector Partnerships: A Case Study of Local Safeguarding Children Boards
Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2009; 24(4): 399 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
B. Houlihan and A. Preece
Independence and Accountability: The Case of the Drug Free Sport Directorate, the UK's National Anti-Doping Organisation
Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2007; 22(4): 381 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
S. Wilks
Boardization and Corporate Governance in the UK as a Response to Depoliticization and Failing Accountability
Public Policy and Administration, October 1, 2007; 22(4): 443 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
B. Evans
The Politics of Partnership: Urban Regeneration in New East Manchester
Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2007; 22(2): 201 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]