This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heard-Lauréote, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Transparency Gap?

The Case of European Agricultural Committee Governance

University of Portsmouth, UK,karen.heard-laureote{at}port.ac.uk

How much are European citizens entitled to know about the European Union's (EU) Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) governance system in general and the European Commission's Agricultural Advisory Committees (AACs) (Agricultural Advisory Groups since April 2004) in particular, and to what extent can EU institutions, the public, and committee members exercise scrutiny over the AACs? Two themes underlie these questions: access to information and scrutiny. These are intrinsic to the notion of transparency, which the article sets out to explore and comment on. It attempts to define the notion in relation to its essential components and in order to assess whether CAP governance through committees is transparent enough to ensure that citizens are ultimately able to exercise democratic control over it, this article gauges AAC intelligibility. Using original empirical research carried out in Autumn 2003, based on interviews with AAC members derived from socio-economic groups as well as European institutions' internal documentary evidence, the article argues that these structures suffer a substantial transparency deficit.

Key Words: agriculture • commission • committees • scrutiny • transparency

References

• Andersen, S.S. and Eliassen, K.A. (eds) (1996) The European Union: How Democratic Is It? London: Sage.
• Benz, A. (2003) `Policy-making and Accountability in EU Multilevel Governance', Workshop Paper. Colchester: ECPR.
• Blumann, C. (1992) `La Comitologie: L'exercise de la Fonction Exécutive dans la Communauté Européenne', in C. Engel and W. Wessels (eds) From Luxembourg to Maastricht: Institutional Change in the European Community after the Single European Act, pp. 89—108. Bonn: Europa Union Verlag.
• Budd, S. and Jones, A. (1989) The European Community: A Guide to the Maze. London: Kogan Page.
• Butt Philip, A. (1985) Pressure Groups in the European Community. London: University Association for Contemporary European Studies.
• Curtin, D.M. (1998) `Democracy, Transparency and Political Participation: Some Progress Post-Amsterdam', in V. Deckmyn and I. Thomson (eds) Openness and Transparency in the European Union, pp. 107—20. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration .
• Dahl, R. (1998) `Political Culture and Economic Development', in R. Kalleberg and F. Engelstad (eds) Social Time and Social Change. Oslo: Scandinavian Universities Press.
• Davis, J. (1998) `Access to and Transmission of Information: Position of the Media', in V. Deckmyn and I. Thomson (eds) Openness and Transparency in the European Union, pp. 121—6. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration .
• Den Boer, M. (1998) `Steamy Windows: Transparency and Openness in Justice and Home Affairs', in V. Deckmyn and I. Thomson (eds) Openness and Transparency in the European Union. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
• Edes, B.W. (2000) `The Role of Public Administration in Providing Information: Information Offices and Citizens Information Services', URL (consulted November 2004): http://www.eipa.nl/Publications/Summaries/1997_2000/WorkingPapers/ConferenceProceedings/BartEdes.pdf
• Florini, A.M. (1999) `Does the Invisible Hand Need a Transparent Glove? The Politics of Transparency', paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, 28—30 April.
• Grant, W. (1993) `Pressure Groups and the European Community: An Overview', in S. Mazey and J. Richardson (eds) Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Grant, W. (1997) The Common Agricultural Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
• Greenwood, J., Grote, J.R. and Ronit, K. (1992) Organised Interests and the European Community . London: Sage.
• Hansard HC Deb vol 430 col 1362w (8 February 2005).
• Heard-Lauréote, K. (2005) `The Agricultural Advisory Committees and Their Role in the Legitimation of European Commission Activities in the European Agricultural Sector', PhD Thesis, School of Languages and Area Studies, University of Portsmouth.
• Hix, S. ( 1999/2005) The Political System of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
• Lodge, J. and Valentine, H. (1980) `The Economic and Social Committee in EEC Decision Making', International Organization 34(2): 265—84.
• Majone, G. (1994) `Independence vs. Accountability?: Non-Majoritarian Institutions and Democratic Government', Working Paper SPS N°94/3. Florence: European University Institute.
• Mazey, S. and Richardson, J. (1991) `Lobbying Styles and European Integration', Workshop Paper. Colchester: ECPR.
• Moser, C. (2001) `How Open is "Open as Possible"?: Three Different Approaches to Transparency and Openness in Regulating Access to EU Documents', URL (consulted November 2004): http://www.his.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_80.pdf
• National Consumer Council (2002) European Governance: A White Paper —Comments by the National Consumer Council. London: NCC.
• Neuhold, C. (2001) `Much Ado About Nothing?: Comitology as a Feature of EU Policy Implementation and its Effects on the Democratic Arena', Workshop Paper. Colchester: ECPR.
• Nugent, N. (1989/2003) The Government and Politics of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Oecd (2001) Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2000. Paris : OECD.
• Oecd (2005) Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation 2005. Paris : OECD.
• Peterson, J. and Bomberg, E. (1999) Decision-Making in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
• Rhinard, M. (2002) `The Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union Committee System', Governance 15(2): 185—210.
• Scharpf, F.W. (1999) Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press .
• Scharpf, F.W. (2003) `Problem Solving Effectiveness and Democratic Accountability in the EU', Working Paper 03/1. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (MPIFG).
• Schmitter, P.C. (2001) `What is there to Legitimize in the European Union and how might this be Accomplished?', Working Paper No. 6/01. New York: Jean Monnet Programme .
• Smismans, S. (2001) `The Legitimacy of Social Partners' Participation in European Occupational Health and Safety Policy', Workshop Paper. Colchester: ECPR .
• Smith, M.J. (1990) The Politics of Agricultural Support in Britain . Aldershot: Dartmouth.
• Vos, E. ( 1997) `The Rise of Committees', European Law Journal 3(3): 210—29.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 2, 239-258 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0952076707075905


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Heard-Lauréote, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?