Public Policy and Administration

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coaffee, J.
Right arrow Articles by Deas, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 23, No. 2, 167-187 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0952076707086254
© 2008 SAGE Publications and PAC

The Search for Policy Innovation in Urban Governance

Lessons from Community-led Regeneration Partnerships

Jon Coaffee

University of Manchester, UK

Iain Deas

University of Manchester, UK, Iain.Deas{at}manchester.ac.uk

Contemporary innovation in local governance in England is, in part, trying to formalize partnership working, drawing on the supposedly exemplary experience of urban policy. The latter has a long history of efforts to promote more effective intergovernmental coordination, vertically between neighbourhood, local authority, regional and central government levels as well as horizontally across agencies, and diagonally with civil society. The reality, as this article demonstrates through the experience of New Labour's flagship New Deal for Communities initiative, is much more complex, even in the case of ostensibly more successful partnerships. In this article we evaluate two partnership case studies — one seen as successful and the other as problematic — in order to highlight the importance of inter- and intra-partnership governance and the potentially damaging concentration of partnership efforts upon meeting spending and outcome targets at the expense of a focus on more challenging issues such as community engagement and the development of creative and innovative solutions to complex problems. This analysis calls into question the practical viability of formalizing and promoting more joined-up governance, reiterating the longstanding difficulty policy makers have encountered in achieving more coordinated policy actions.

Key Words: community engagement • governance • local partnership • urban policy


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?