Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leach, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lowndes, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Of Roles and Rules

Analysing the Changing Relationship between Political Leaders and Chief Executives in Local Government

Steve Leach

Local Governance Research Unit, Leicester Business School, Bosworth House, De Montfort University, The Gateway, Leicester,De Montfort University, UK,snleach{at}dmu.ac.uk

Vivien Lowndes

Local Governance Research Unit, Leicester Business School, Bosworth House, De Montfort University, UK,vlowndes{at}dmu.ac.uk

In Britain the formal institutional framework within which local leadership takes place has been transformed since 1997 — through new arrangements for executive decision-making and the introduction of `comprehensive performance assessment'. The article looks at how such changes have affected the relationship between political and managerial leaders in local government. Drawing on primary research, the article examines the interaction between the formal changes associated with `modernization' and existing conventions governing the leader—chief executive relationship. Many `informal rules' still persist, serving sometimes to reinforce new expectations and sometimes to undermine them. But other informal rules are being modified, and some entirely new rules are being created, as political leaders and chief executives interpret the new landscape and renegotiate their division of labour. Old habits do indeed die hard, but — paradoxically — they may also form the raw material out of which new working rules are fashioned. The research suggests that the most effective reform strategies are those that seek to exploit, rather than frustrate, the efforts of intelligent institutional entrepreneurs on the ground.

Key Words: chief executives • leadership • local government • local politics • mayors • new institutionalism

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 22, No. 2, 183-200 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0952076707075892


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?