Public Policy and Administration

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parry, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 18, No. 4, 3-19 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/095207670301800402
© 2003 SAGE Publications and PAC

The Influence of Heclo and Wildavsky's

The Private Government of Public Money

Richard Parry

University of Edinburgh

Hugh Heclo and Aaron Wildavsky's Private Government of Public Money was one of the most influential public policy books of the 1970s because of the flair of its analysis and its pioneering use of interviews with policy-makers. Despite a revision in 1981 it fails to predict the demise of the system it celebrated the Public Expenditure Survey and associated Policy Analysis and Review - and its influence on subsequent studies of the Treasury has not been great. More lasting have been its analytical themes - the notion of ‘political administrators ’including both ministers and officials, a ‘trial of personalities’ as the key to policy-making, and the importance of the technical dynamics of the system in constraining behaviour. It pioneered a new way of writing about British central administration, although its depersonalised and anonymised presentation, and masculinised image of the ‘club’ has been superseded. Some of the authors' policy prescriptions have also proved prescient. Although the book now seems to lack the systematic and quantitative analysis that its subject-matter invited, its written style is memorable and its effect on other researchers remains inspirational.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?