Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pongsiri, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public-Private Partnerships in Thailand: A Case Study of the Electric Utility Industry

Nutavoot Pongsiri

University of Manchester

Although public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been viewed as a framework for describing intersectoral co-operative ventures between government and the private sector, little attention has been paid in previous researches to the characteristics of co-operative behaviour in the partnering organisations, as well as the measurement of partnership performance. This study blends important features of the Transaction Cost Economics (TCE) paradigm with the Interorganisational Relations (IORs) theory to better understand the maintenance of public-private partnerships in Thailand's electric utility industry. Empirical results obtained from the questionnaire survey of public and private management executives from seventy-one organisations indicated several interesting factors relevant to implementation of successful public-private partnerships. These factors include risk allocation, the use of constructive conflict resolution techniques, control of asymmetric relationships, and the existence of contractual safeguards for sovereign risks. This study also offers some insights into the dynamics of the differences between the private and public sectors pertaining to partnership performance. The findings reveal that respondents in government/state-owned enterprises were more likely to perceive partnership performance based on programme performance improvement, better service/product provisions, and more opportunities to expand their business interests. The private firms, on the other hand, were more likely to focus on better investment potential and more opportunities to expand their business interests. Private with part-state ownership organisations identified more opportunities to expand their business interests as the most apparent indicator.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 18, No. 3, 69-90 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/095207670301800306


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?