Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnett, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Local government, New Labour and ‘Active Welfare’: A Case of ‘Self Responsibilisation’?

Neil Barnett

Leeds Metropolitan University

The paradoxes within the ‘modernising’ project for local government have been well documented. However, these can be used to locate the local government agenda within broader changes to the welfare state. New Labour, in line with Third Way thinking, are attempting to create an ‘active welfare’ state, which stresses rights and responsibilities. Key elements here are duty to become involved and take up opportunities. As a part of the welfare system, Local authorities are responsible for implementing this agenda and for including themselves within it. The increasing move towards whole organisational audit and of ‘earned autonomy’ can be seen in this light. ‘Self inclusion’ and ‘ownership’ of the agenda are key elements within this re-structured approach. Using the Foucauldian notion of governmentality, it is argued that this represents a technology of government which is likely to have unintended consequences.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 18, No. 3, 25-38 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/095207670301800303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?