Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The information revolution, health reform and doctor-manager relations

Bruce Wood

University of Manchester

In the 1980s and 1990s in both Britain and America computerisation of patient data led to a raft of comparative performance indicators. The 'information revolution' began with measures of efficiency (or outputs, such as bed usage and length of hospital stay); more recently attention has begun to focus on effectiveness (or clinical outcomes, as in the case of evidence-based medicine). Simultaneously health reforms centred, in Britain, on improved management systems and the introduction of a quasi-market, and, in the United States, on managed care, cost controls and hospital mergers. This case-study of an American general hospital uses the classic Alford framework of three groups of structural interests (doctors, managers and patients) to assess the impact of these informational and organisational developments on doctor-manager relations in Britain and America. Cross-cutting local alliances based on common interests indicate that Alford's groups of structural interests should not be perceived as monolithic.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1-13 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/095207679901400101


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
B. J. O'Toole
The Framework of Ethical Compliance in the UK: Minor Problems, Disproportionate Responses?
Public Policy and Administration, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 109 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
S. Horton
The Public Service Ethos in the British Civil Service: An Historical Institutional Analysis
Public Policy and Administration, January 1, 2006; 21(1): 32 - 48.
[Abstract] [PDF]