Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Public Policy and Administration
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarence, E.
Right arrow Articles by Painter, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public Services under New Labour: collaborative discourses and local networking

Emma Clarence

Christopher Painter

University of Central England in Birmingham

A by-product of the fragmentation of services that occurred at local government level under the Conservative Government was the emergence of networks and other forms of joint working. These became formalised particularly through various economic and urban regeneration schemes. But elsewhere they were often an ad hoc response to the changing local governance structures. The election of the Labour Government in 1997 has, this article contends, seen the emergence of a more collaborative discourse in which networking and partnership are the intentional outcomes of many of the central government's policy initiatives, including the Education and Health Action Zones and the Social Exclusion Unit. This collaborative discourse is founded on a perception of the importance of trusting, mutually beneficial relationships, as distinct from adversarial, low trust relationships, to achieving central government aims and objectives. Based on interviews with local authority Leaders and Chief Executives, and other 'elite' actors, the article explores how well local authorities are responding to the challenges and opportunities that these policy initiatives will bring both with regard to internal structures and decision making processes, as well as to the role of the local authority in local governance networks.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 13, No. 3, 8-22 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/095207679801300302


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EvaluationHome page
N. Mays, S. Wyke, and D. Evans
The Evaluation of Complex Health Policy: Lessons from the UK Total Purchasing Experiment
Evaluation, October 1, 2001; 7(4): 405 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Painter and E. Clarence
UK Local Action Zones and Changing Urban Governance
Urban Stud, July 1, 2001; 38(8): 1215 - 1232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EvaluationHome page
S. Martin and I. Sanderson
Evaluating Public Policy Experiments: Measuring Outcomes, Monitoring Processes or Managing Pilots?
Evaluation, July 1, 1999; 5(3): 245 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]