This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hood, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Contemporary public management: a new global paradigm?

London School of Economics and Political Science

This paper takes another look at the much-canvassed idea of a 'new global paradigm' emerging in contemporary public management. It argues that, linguistic usage apart, the 'globality' and monoparadigmatic character of contemporary public management change seems to be exaggerated. Three interrelated objections are advanced against the claim of an emerging new global paradigm. First, it is argued that contemporary reform ideas, particularly those advanced by Osborne and Gaebler, are culturally plural rather than homogenous. Second, it is argued that there are substantial biases towards exaggerating international similarity in public management reforms, but that the similarity weakens when we go beyond semantic packaging to examine the specific content of reform initiatives. Third, it is claimed that there are also built- in biases for overstressing the continuity of contemporary public management reforms, but that in fact there are major obstacles to the emergence of a stable new paradigm in public management. One is the underlying mutual repulsion of the multiple reform paradigms today, and the other is the frequency of self disequilibrating processes in public management reform associated with the production of unintended side-effects and reverse effects.

Public Policy and Administration, Vol. 10, No. 2, 104-117 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/095207679501000208


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.-M. Sawyer, D. Green, A. Moran, and J. Brett Should the nurse change the light globe?: Human service professionals managing risk on the frontline Journal of Sociology, December 1, 2009; 45(4): 361 - 381. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. K. Anheier What Kind of Nonprofit Sector, What Kind of Society?: Comparative Policy Reflections American Behavioral Scientist, March 1, 2009; 52(7): 1082 - 1094. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Samaratunge, Q. Alam, and J. Teicher The New Public Management reforms in Asia: a comparison of South and Southeast Asian countries International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 1, 2008; 74(1): 25 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. D. Terry The Thinning of Administrative Institutions in the Hollow State Administration Society, September 1, 2005; 37(4): 426 - 444. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Keen Markets, Quasi-Markets and Middle Managers in Local Government Public Policy and Administration, July 1, 1997; 12(3): 42 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]